Clinical Trial

Ultrasound Guided Midline vs Landmark Paramedian Continous Spinal Anesthesia in the Elderly

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated December 18, 2024 (before its estimated August 31, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
Former clinical studies have reported the superiority of the landmark guided paramedian approach above the classical landmark guided midline approach for the continuous spinal anesthesia especially in the elderly. On the other hand, more recent clinical trials have suggested that the use of ultrasound to guide spinal anesthesia will be safer and more effective than the conventional palpation-guided technique. The aim of this study will be to compare the conventional "blind" landmark paramedian approach to the ultrasound "modern" guided midline approach for the continuous spinal anesthesia in the elderly with hip fractures. Patients will randomly divided into two groups: Group(PML): will undergo conventional landmark guided paramedian continuous spinal anesthesia Group (MUS): will undergo ultrasound guided midline continuous spinal anesthesia
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06740994
Lead Sponsor University Tunis El Manar
Conditions Spinal Anesthesia
Enrollment 110 participants
Start Date 2024-04-29
Primary Completion 2025-08-31 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-08-31 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2024-12-18