Clinical Trial

Efficacy of Transoral Versus Transbuccal Technique for Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture

Not Yet Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated October 9, 2024 (before its estimated June 1, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if transbuccal technique for mandibular angle fracture is better than transoral technique. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does transbuccal technique provide better mouth opening than transoral technique * Radiographic gap and displacement between fracture lines is more prevalent in transoral technique than transbuccal technique postoperatively Researcher will compare both the techniques to see if transbuccal technique works better than transoral technique Participants will: * Be assessed 1 week , 1 month and 3 months postoperatively * Their mouth opening will be assessed by measuring interincisal opening with ruler * Radiographic gap between fracture segments and displacement of fractured segments will be measured on OPG through ruler
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2024-09-29.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06622642
Lead Sponsor Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Pakistan
Conditions Mandibular Angle Fracture, Surgical Approach & Incisions
Enrollment 68 participants
Start Date 2024-12-01
Primary Completion 2025-06-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-06-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2024-10-09