EMR Versus CSP in the Treatment of Sessile Serrated Lesions Less Than 10mm in Size

StatusUnknown
PhaseNot applicable
Started

Record status This record was last updated September 25, 2024 (before its estimated October 1, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.

Free. We email you which fields changed when ClinicalTrials.gov updates this record.

Track this trial
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

See every version on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

  1. Changed Registry marked status Unknown (sponsor has not verified the record since Sep 2024); last known: Not Yet Recruiting
  2. Eligibility criteria shortened, about 1 wordv2
  3. Study First Submitted
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
Fudan University
634 trials monitored
See 8 trials at risk
A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in treating colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) less than 10mm in size.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06609031
Lead Sponsor Fudan University
Conditions
(from sponsor)		 Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesion
Enrollment 270 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov