Clinical Trial

Letrozole-stimulated Cycle Strategy Versus Artificial Cycle Strategy (LETSACT)

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated September 25, 2025 (before its estimated April 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the letrozole-stimulated cycle strategy versus the artificial cycle strategy for endometrial preparation in women with irregular menstrual cycles after one cycle of endometrial preparation. The primary question it aims to answer is: • Does the letrozole-stimulated cycle strategy for endometrial preparation result in a higher live birth rate compared to the artificial cycle strategy in women with irregular menstrual cycles after one cycle of endometrial preparation? Participants will undergo screening before endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer, following which they will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: LETS or AC. In the LETS group, investigators will prescribe letrozole 5 milligrams/day for 5 days to stimulate follicular development and micronized progesterone 800 milligrams/day for luteal phase support. In contrast, the AC group will receive oral estradiol valerate 6-12 milligrams/day and micronized progesterone 800 milligrams/day. Researchers will compare the LETS and AC groups to determine if there are differences in live birth rates.
Protocol Amendment History 4 amendments
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended 4 times since 2024-04-16; most recent amendment 2025-09-22.
Status change: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting 2024-05-02
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06372119
Lead Sponsor Mỹ Đức Hospital
Conditions Embryo Transfer, Irregular Menstruation, Letrozole, Hormone Replacement Therapy
Enrollment 790 participants
Start Date 2024-04-22
Primary Completion 2026-04 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-04 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-09-25