Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT06284174 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

Effectiveness of Povidone-Iodine Versus Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solutions in Reducing Microbial Contamination in Spinal Surgery Wounds During Intraoperative Soaking.

StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Started
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

  1. Study completion date: Dec 31, 2024 to May 31, 2025
    • Site details revised
    v2
  2. Study First Submitted
  • Stopped: an ongoing trial was terminated, suspended or withdrawn.
  • Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
This study aims to assess the efficacy of intraoperative wound irrigation with iodine-containing and chlorhexidine-containing solutions in reducing bacterial colonization during spine surgery, and to determine which solution is more effective. Additionally, we aim to evaluate any side effects associated with the use of these two antiseptic solutions for wound irrigation.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06284174
Lead Sponsor National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Conditions
(from sponsor)		 Spine Infection
Related terms Surgical Wound Infection
Enrollment 105 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov