Clinical Trial

Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization

Enrolling by Invitation
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated December 16, 2024 (before its estimated March 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of a small camera (videoscope) in conjunction with magnification glasses during surgery vs. surgery only using magnification glasses. Both methods are routinely used and are standard of care methods of visualization. The small camera (videoscope) is a device which allows us to see the area under high magnification and projects live video feed on a computer screen. The study is a split-mouth design pilot study. The patients are only receiving treatment that was previously diagnosed prior to entering the study. The treatment performed is standard treatment that fits in the routine standard of care. No interventional treatment is being performed. The only difference is the method of visualization/observation by the practitioner used during the surgical procedure. One side of the mouth will be treated with just loupes while the other side of the mouth will be treated with loupes and the videoscope.
Protocol Amendment History 2 amendments
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended 2 times since 2023-06-26; most recent amendment 2024-12-12.
Status change: Not Yet Recruiting → Enrolling by Invitation 2023-11-27
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT05932017
Lead Sponsor Texas A&M University
Conditions Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Pocket, Periodontitis, Periodontal Inflammation, Periodontal Attachment Loss, Periodontal Bone Loss, Surgery
Enrollment 20 participants
Start Date 2023-07-01
Primary Completion 2025-03 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-03 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2024-12-16