Clinical Trial

Uterine Manipulator Versus no Uterine Manipulator in Endometrial Cancer Trial

Study acronym: MANEC
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Minimally invasive surgery is the recommended approach in endometrial cancer (EC) patients based on the results of two randomized controlled trials, given its advantages without compromised oncologic outcomes. The uterine manipulator is commonly used in benign and malignant pathologies to perform a laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. However, although regularly used, the uterine manipulator adoption in EC is a controversial technical aspect due to the raised concerns regarding the possible risk of disruption of the tumor mass, the spread of malignant cells, and seeding of the disease, particularly at the level of the vaginal cuff or spread of tumor cells, with increased risk of recurrence and death due to EC. On that basis, given that hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator is feasible, only a randomized controlled trial comparing oncologic outcomes in EC patients after use versus not use of the uterine manipulator will be able to provide high-quality evidence to answer this critical question and allow or exclude the use of a uterine manipulator during minimally invasive hysterectomy for EC.
Protocol Amendment History 5 amendments
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended 5 times since 2023-01-13; most recent amendment 2026-04-28.
Status change: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting 2023-04-01
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT05687084
Lead Sponsor Universita di Verona
Conditions Endometrial Neoplasms
Enrollment 1,030 participants
Start Date 2023-01-16
Primary Completion 2031-12-31 (estimated)
Study Completion 2031-12-31 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-05-05