Clinical Trial

Subthreshold SCS or BMT

Study acronym: TRADITION
Active, Not Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Given the substantial socioeconomic impact of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) implantations and given that currently no direct high-quality evidence with a relevant outcome measurement is available to guide the treatment choice between subthreshold SCS versus best medical treatment in patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2), we here propose a scientifically well-constructed randomized controlled trial to answer this question. The primary scientific objective is to examine whether subthreshold SCS, compared to best medical treatment, provided to patients with PSPS-T2 results in a higher percentage of clinical holistic responders at 6 months. The secondary objective of the study is to examine if subthreshold SCS compared with BMT is having more efficacy in improving patients' individual competencies for self-management, increasing the likelihood to return to work, work status and healthcare expenditure, improving pain relief, obtaining pain medication reduction, decreasing anxiety and depression, increasing quality of life and decreasing disability.
Protocol Amendment History 4 amendments
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended 4 times since 2021-12-22; most recent amendment 2025-10-01.
Status change: Recruiting → Active, Not Recruiting 2025-10-01
Status change: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting 2022-02-09
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT05169047
Lead Sponsor Moens Maarten
Conditions Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Enrollment 114 participants
Start Date 2022-02-07
Primary Completion 2026-08 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-08 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-10-07