Clinical Trial

Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy Performed by Robot-assisted Laparoscopy or Conventional Laparoscopy or by Laparotomy

Study acronym: EMUPRO
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Minimally invasive surgery has developed widely since the 1980s and has revolutionized the practices of surgeons. In urology, the development of laparoscopy and then robot-assisted surgery has considerably improved the management of pathologies. In France, as in all the countries concerned, the spread of robotic surgery has taken place without prior studies validating this new technology, nor organizational rules in terms of quality and access to care. The report of the Haute Autorité de Santé dated November 2016 underlines the weakness of the methodological quality of studies and meta-analyzes evaluating robot-assisted total prostatectomy compared to other surgical techniques by laparotomy or conventional laparoscopy. It therefore appears important to evaluate in a large study the interest of this technique in order to help the authorities to decide on the real benefit of this technology and to provide reliable answers to the patients.
Protocol Amendment History 10 amendments
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended 10 times since 2020-11-16; most recent amendment 2026-04-20.
Status change: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting 2021-03-10
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT04638088
Lead Sponsor Elsan
Conditions Prostate Cancer
Enrollment 2,000 participants
Start Date 2021-03-08
Primary Completion 2025-07-21 (estimated)
Study Completion 2030-04-30 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-04-21