Clinical Trial

A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics

Study acronym: TREX
Active, Not Recruiting Phase 3
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated August 1, 2025 (before its estimated March 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios. The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine). Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding. A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact. The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely. The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer. Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic. They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
Protocol Amendment History 13 amendments
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended 13 times since 2017-03-19; most recent amendment 2025-07-30.
Status change: Recruiting → Active, Not Recruiting 2023-04-27
Status change: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting 2017-08-20
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT03089905
Lead Sponsor Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Collaborators: Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Baylor College of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, The Cleveland Clinic, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Royal Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Queensland Children's Hospital, Perth Children's Hospital, Women and Children's Hospital, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Flinders Medical Centre
Conditions Anesthesia, Neurotoxicity, Child Development
Enrollment 450 participants
Start Date 2017-08-10
Primary Completion 2026-03 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-06 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-08-01