CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 3
Started

Free. We email you which fields changed when ClinicalTrials.gov updates this record.

Track this trial
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

See every version on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

  1. Study sites: 0 to 1v6
  2. Study Status, Referencesv5
  3. Primary completion date: Dec 28, 2005
    • Study completion date: Mar 2005 to Dec 28, 2005
    v4
  4. Re-verified, no change to tracked fieldsv3
  5. Eligibility criteria shortened, about 3 wordsv2
  6. Study First Submitted
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
To evaluate whether bilevel positive airway pressure more rapidly improves ventilation than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with acute pulmonary edema. CPAP is delivered via a simple device connected to oxygen.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT00213681
Lead Sponsor University Hospital, Rouen
Conditions
(from sponsor)		 Severe Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Related terms Pulmonary Edema, Respiratory Insufficiency
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov